Tool comparisons

Two content-discovery tools that solve the same first problem — 'what answers on this path?' — with different ergonomics around filtering and templating.

One tool optimises for knowing what a service is; the other optimises for asking a very large address range one question quickly.

RustScan finds open TCP ports fast and can hand them to Nmap for the detail. The comparison is mostly about whether you want that split.

Both read the same capture format. One is an analysis environment; the other is a capture utility that fits on a server.

Both work offline against captured hashes. The practical difference is GPU throughput and kernel breadth versus format agility and rules tooling.